🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard women from violence, covering family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a move that rights groups described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the EU in last year, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose head has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked widespread protest both inside the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian petition demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could potentially return the bill for further review if he has concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could influence similar debates in other member states